
sales@bristolcleaningcontrol.com


Bristol Cleaning Control Key Performance Indicators (KPI)
KPI |
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Poor |
Very Poor |
Cleaning Standard |
The standard of clean as observed on regular inspection this month is excellent, no issues to rectify. Always the same high standard. |
The standard of clean as observed on regular inspection this month is very good, few issues to action. Usually a consistent high standard. |
The standard of clean as observed on regular inspection this month is acceptable, few issues to action. Consistently to an acceptable standard. |
The standard of clean as observed on regular inspection this month is below standard, several issues to rectify. Inconsistent, often a lot of issues to deal with. |
The standard of clean as observed on regular inspection this month is very poor standard, building was noticeably unclean. Very inconsistent usually a poor standard. |
Complaints |
We receive compliments from public and clients but no complaints. |
Very few complaints or none, from the public or clients. |
Few complaints from the public or clients and promptly attended to. |
Several complaints from the public or clients. |
Constant complaints from public or clients. |
Customer Service |
Individual cleaners go above and beyond the call of duty. High standard verified by client. |
Cleaners are proactive in offering service. High standard verified by client. |
Acceptable. Cleaners are polite and helpful. High standard verified by client |
Needs improvement cleaners polite, but not very helpful. Poor feedback from client. |
Poor or none. Cleaners are impolite. Specific complaints from client. |
Waste Management |
Docks are spotless. Waste system is optimised; cleaners make pro-active contribution. |
Docks are excellent; waste management is excellent. |
Docks are acceptable, Waste management is acceptable. |
Some problems in docks. |
Docks are unacceptable; waste system is disorganised Recycling is not effective. |
Safety Management System (SMS) |
Excellent SMS. Includes up to date training records. Clear signs of implementation. No H&S infringments. |
Very good SMS, includes training records. Clear signs of implementation. Very few minor H&S infringements. |
Acceptable SMS. Documentation is complete and safe work practices are observed. |
SMS is incomplete or needs improvement. Doubts over implementation. |
Inadequate SMS. Definite signs of non-implementation. Unsafe work practices are observed. |
Public Liability |
Cleaner tracks public liability claims and is pro active; very low number of claims. |
Very low number of claims. We are confident the rotations are being met; cleaners fill in statements when required. |
Low number of claims; cleaners promptly attend spills and fill in statements. |
Too many claims; slow to action. Slow or poor statements. |
Poor handling of spills; many claims. Poor compliance with statements. |
Stability of Supervisors & Staff |
Expert supervisor and area managers, with little or no changes. Few site staff changes. |
Very good supervisor and area manager; changes are rare. Few site staff changes. |
Site supervisor / area managers do not change often. Site staff reasonably stable. |
Too many changes to senior staff. Many changes to site staff. |
Site supervisor and/or area manager change frequently. Many changes to site staff. |
Presentation & Uniforms |
All staff are well presented, in perfect uniform and equipped at all times. |
All staff are well presented. Very high standard of uniforms almost all the time, few exceptions. |
Occasional exceptions but promptly rectified. Overall acceptable. |
Often a staff member unacceptable. |
Many people often out of uniform or look untidy or not equipped. |